home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: stdc.demon.co.uk!clive
- From: clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (Clive D.W. Feather)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c
- Subject: Re: brief summary of Technical Corrigendum 2
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:02:32 GMT
- Organization: Demon Internet Limited (personal account)
- Message-ID: <DLEzGA.JLG@stdc.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4d554m$q4b@news1.halcyon.com> <4dfgdt$se6@der.twinsun.com> <DLC97p.88M@stdc.demon.co.uk> <4dloed$oi1@info1.sdrc.com>
- Reply-To: clive@demon.net
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stdc.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <4dloed$oi1@info1.sdrc.com>,
- Larry Jones <scjones@thor.sdrc.com> wrote:
- >>> * va_start and va_end must be invoked in corresponding pairs,
- >>> and the pairs cannot nest.
- >> Huh ? I understood (and it's my DR they're replying to) that the pairs
- >> *can* nest.
- > I don't know if that was a typo or a thinko, but I suspect that what
- > Paul meant to say was that the pairs cannot interleave.
- [...]
-
- Same comment. From memory, the only thing that was ruled illegal was not
- having them in pairs.
-
- --
- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler,
- cdwf@cityscape.co.uk (work, preferred) | it will get its revenge.
- clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (home) | - Henry Spencer
-